The Supreme Court Will Hear Pleas Challenging Validity Of A Law From 1991 Regarding Religious Places

As tourism got welcomed after the coronavirus, people started exploring new places and regions. We saw a major religious outbreak in the country when the people were exploring the places. Many religious places got targeted, just recently Jain’s prestigious place was under consideration when the government announced it as a public attraction.

But now things can be viewed differently. You may be able to get challenging yet validating law practice from 1991. The Supreme Court is all ready to hear the pleas that challenge the validity of the constitutional law made in 1991. It is with respect to religious places and practices. 

What initiated it? Thanks to the PILs or the public interest litigation that challenged the validation of many provisions in 1991. It was based on the law that forbade lawsuits to reclaim prestigious places. These places may be related to worship or other religious practices like spiritual healing to name a few. 

These came into the spotlight back in 1947 when the country got independence, on august 15- and now Supreme Court is all ready to hear the new innings. It will be done on Monday regarding the set of PILs that are related to the same. The validity of these provisions done in 1991 as per the law is taken into the consideration.

These are also with respect to the prohibition of filing a lawsuit. It will be done to seek a change in the reclamation of the place of worship and the character change that was done back on august 15, 1947.

There are a total of 6 petitions that are included with chief justice DY Chandrachud and P.S. Narasimha. These are inclusive of those filed by the former Rajya Sabha member MP Subramanian Swamy. These were against the provisions of the law that got into consideration and are going to be discussed on Monday.

The validity of 1991 laws and regulations has been brought into consideration since the last edit. And why not? The practices have changed and so have the religious practices. All these PILs were challenging and based on certain provisions- now will be seen in the new perspective. Reclaiming a place of worship is another thing we have to consider- the discussions will be done shortly on Monday.

People want to know the outcome of the discussions, it was on November 14 that solicitor General Tushar Mehta was appearing to have an affidavit for the union. It was regarding dealing with the facets of the case and ensuring that the filing was due to deliberations at the government’s various levels. It was a long due discussion and was on the same request that it demanded a counter affidavit. 

The counter one was issued on December 12 and the same copy was circulated to petitions and intervenors. The last date of hearing was given on January 9 and will be discussed. 

Sections of consideration- 2,3, and 4.

Read More:

Explore Paro: The Valley Of Bhutan-2023!

Who Is Rahul Tripathi? Unknown Facts About Rahul Tripathi!